salchrist:

Elizabeth Gilbert on happiness and intimacy as related to Schopenhauer’s porcupine analogy. 

The porcupine dilemma is as innate to human experience as breathing is to “living.” The act of allowing people in, allowing someone else to see what’s happening within the closed rooms of one’s heart is sometimes almost terrifyingly impossible and for some of us, it remains one of the heaviest learning experiences of our lives (I am one of these people.) We don’t want to allow our own personal dramas—no matter how big or small—to bleed onto other people because we’re “supposed” to be un-needing picture of self-sufficiency and independence. 

Well, big surprise…sometimes we all need a little extra body heat to get through the darkness of our night.

stickyembraces:

Would Schopenhauer still have hated life as much if he had owned a baby sloth?

stickyembraces:

Would Schopenhauer still have hated life as much if he had owned a baby sloth?

wolfdancer:

The Dance that is Life

  1. Camera: Nikon D100
  2. Aperture: f/8
  3. Exposure: 1/125th
  4. Focal Length: 38mm

thefulcanelli-horizon:

Michele Foucault and Gilles Deleuze just after debating each other on prisons.

Notice the creepy eyed dude in the camel skin jacket.

You know, the dude with the fucked up eye?

Yeah, just Jean-Paul Sartre lurking in the background.

Does Deleuze know that Sartre is giving him the “look”?  If so, I hope Deleuze wasn’t thinking about dirty thoughts with Foucault’s bald head.

(Source: terrorofexistence)

amysticvelvet:

Above: Summer in the City
Below: Excursion into Philosphy
by Edward Hopper 
amysticvelvet:

Above: Summer in the City
Below: Excursion into Philosphy
by Edward Hopper 

amysticvelvet:

Above: Summer in the City

Below: Excursion into Philosphy

by Edward Hopper 

rhizombie:

pnoom:

get drunk y’all

Last night someone asked me why I liked to drink. This explains.

rhizombie:

pnoom:

get drunk y’all

Last night someone asked me why I liked to drink. This explains.

(Source: printed-ink)

"The pleasure of everything beautiful, the consolation afforded by art, the enthusiasm of the artist which enables him to forget the cares of life, this one advantage of the genius over other men alone compensating him for the suffering that is heightened in proportion to the clearness of consciousness, and for the desert loneliness among a different race of men, all this is due to the fact that, as we shall see later on, the in-itself of life, the will, existence itself, is a constant suffering, and is partly woeful, partly fearful. The same thing, on the other hand, as representation alone, purely contemplated, or repeated through art, free from pain, presents us with a significant spectacle. This purely knowledge side of the world and its repetition in any art is the element of the artist. He is captivated by a consideration of the spectacle of the will’s objectification. He sticks to this, and does not get tired of contemplating it, and of repeating it in his descriptions. Meanwhile, he himself bears the cost of producing that play; in other words, he himself is the will objectifying itself and reaming in constant suffering. That pure, true, and profound knowledge of the inner nature of the world now becomes for him an end in itself; at it he stops. Therefore it does not become for him a quieter of the will, as we shall see in the following book in the case of the saint who has attained resignation; it does not deliver him from life for ever, but only for a few moments. For him it is not the way out of life, but only an occasional consolation in it, until his power, enhanced by this contemplation, finally becomes tired of the spectacle, and seizes the serious side of things."
— Schopenhauer, The World As Will and Representation (via laughterandinsanity)

(Source: liberumarbitriumindifferentiae)

"An image of thought called philosophy has been formed historically and it effectively stops people from thinking."
Gilles Deleuze, Dialogues II (via nontology)